I wouldnt feel safe with the 6 of spades in my hand unless i had the 7 of
spades with it
jesusthroughmary
January 3, 2014
If one person has the 6, the 7 is irrelevant.
Dummi42
January 3, 2014
sometimes i’m just so YOLO i definitely would have folded too just so that
i can tell my friends: you know what? i once folded a straight flush, it
was so awesome 😀
Q Nguyen
January 3, 2014
that was a bad fold by esfandiari
Ferhan Mahmood
January 3, 2014
well I can tell you that Antonio knows that Dan the man loves to play
suited connectors… like 67, 89 or just off suit soooo.. i can see why he
laid it down.. ehh its poker baby.
Bexx Bissell
January 3, 2014
Antonio felt Daniel was holding the 7s….. so good fold
TheKOUDAk
January 3, 2014
Yeah, he could have 6, but it was almost 1-2 percent … i would never fold
it… 😉
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014
confess it? he said it on his full contact poker site!
Alex Padilla
January 3, 2014
67 of spades is the stone called nuts.
guly
January 3, 2014
when did he “confess” that ??? and to who ? u ?? terrible laydown from
esfandiari…
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014
Daniel had the 6 of spades
Bballguy1121
January 3, 2014
stone cold
den525
January 3, 2014
actually 67 of spades is the stone cold nuts…
KillaNinja0
January 3, 2014
and that’s why your a professional and esfandiari is a retard amateur player
psilotek
January 3, 2014
same here
AuzzieGunner
January 3, 2014
But if one player has the 6 of spades, then obviously the other player cant
have it, so effectively it is the ‘nuts,’ as you can’t make a higher
straight without the 6 of spades in this case. But yes, technically 6-7 of
spades would be the absolute nuts.
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014
He admitted it on his full contact poker site in a Q&A, as a result it was
a good laydown from Esfandiari. Good enough for you sir??
Manuel Fallah
January 3, 2014
somebody answer please is esfandiari did mistake for fold hand? because pot
where be chap chap/ thanks for response
Rohan Kamath
January 3, 2014
never call to chop a pot bro.. amateur play ..
Kyuutoryuu
January 3, 2014
i dont believe it, link me the interview. Even then he could easily lie
just to give himself more credit
Huina Muina
January 3, 2014
they know one another too well, it s well beyond the theory books between
them.
Catalin Titei
January 3, 2014
That`s why Antonio Esfandiari won 18 milion $ and you`ll never win 1-2
percent of that amount ! 🙂
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014
I couldn’t find that now, I have no idea where to find it. You’ll just hav
to take my word for it i’m afraid
Pyro Netic
January 3, 2014You got to be kidding me… *Facepalm*
glenflesklad
January 3, 2014I wouldnt feel safe with the 6 of spades in my hand unless i had the 7 of
spades with it
jesusthroughmary
January 3, 2014If one person has the 6, the 7 is irrelevant.
Dummi42
January 3, 2014sometimes i’m just so YOLO i definitely would have folded too just so that
i can tell my friends: you know what? i once folded a straight flush, it
was so awesome 😀
Q Nguyen
January 3, 2014that was a bad fold by esfandiari
Ferhan Mahmood
January 3, 2014well I can tell you that Antonio knows that Dan the man loves to play
suited connectors… like 67, 89 or just off suit soooo.. i can see why he
laid it down.. ehh its poker baby.
Bexx Bissell
January 3, 2014Antonio felt Daniel was holding the 7s….. so good fold
TheKOUDAk
January 3, 2014Yeah, he could have 6, but it was almost 1-2 percent … i would never fold
it… 😉
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014confess it? he said it on his full contact poker site!
Alex Padilla
January 3, 201467 of spades is the stone called nuts.
guly
January 3, 2014when did he “confess” that ??? and to who ? u ?? terrible laydown from
esfandiari…
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014Daniel had the 6 of spades
Bballguy1121
January 3, 2014stone cold
den525
January 3, 2014actually 67 of spades is the stone cold nuts…
KillaNinja0
January 3, 2014and that’s why your a professional and esfandiari is a retard amateur player
psilotek
January 3, 2014same here
AuzzieGunner
January 3, 2014But if one player has the 6 of spades, then obviously the other player cant
have it, so effectively it is the ‘nuts,’ as you can’t make a higher
straight without the 6 of spades in this case. But yes, technically 6-7 of
spades would be the absolute nuts.
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014He admitted it on his full contact poker site in a Q&A, as a result it was
a good laydown from Esfandiari. Good enough for you sir??
Manuel Fallah
January 3, 2014somebody answer please is esfandiari did mistake for fold hand? because pot
where be chap chap/ thanks for response
Rohan Kamath
January 3, 2014never call to chop a pot bro.. amateur play ..
Kyuutoryuu
January 3, 2014i dont believe it, link me the interview. Even then he could easily lie
just to give himself more credit
Huina Muina
January 3, 2014they know one another too well, it s well beyond the theory books between
them.
Catalin Titei
January 3, 2014That`s why Antonio Esfandiari won 18 milion $ and you`ll never win 1-2
percent of that amount ! 🙂
JamieMillwall
January 3, 2014I couldn’t find that now, I have no idea where to find it. You’ll just hav
to take my word for it i’m afraid
Mohammad Amin Valian
January 3, 2014none of them had a spade